April 30, 2020 – Part 2

Why, you may ask, am I so pre-occupied with taxes all of a sudden? At a time when so many other things seem to be of higher priority, like, whether/when we should re-open our schools, businesses, etc. Because I have come to the conclusion/realization that common sense approaches to the issues of the day simply don’t work anymore. I have come to accept, begrudgingly, that we are not “one nation, indivisible” anymore. That we operate in completely different spheres/bubbles, with different “truths” yes, even different “facts.” So we are not able to fix things in the manner that our society was designed to make those repairs. We are not able to disagree without being disagreeable. We are not capable of hashing out our differences with an eye towards finding a reasonable compromise. The pendulum swings much wider and farther than ever before–the same nation that elected Obama, immediately thereafter elected 45. And the two sides seemingly are no less thrilled with the one they voted for, than they are disgusted with the other one. As I’ve said before, if Conservatives and Liberals were dating right now, would either one of us propose marriage to the other? Heck no! So, maybe we don’t need to stay married, either.

But the one thing that seems to somehow resonate with people from both sides of the aisle, is their pocketbook/wallet. So I am trying to connect through that small sliver of rationale that we somehow are able to respond to predictably/similarly. If it makes my economic life better, maybe I’ll listen. (As an example, remember all of the Town Hall meetings where Republicans were getting beaten to a pulp for trying to get rid of Obamacare? Do you think those citizens in Red states/districts were there in support of President Obama himself? Heck no! They were there shouting about their own, personal health-care coverage options. Somehow, someone had made it plain enough to them where they could see that Obamacare was in their best interests. That “pre-existing conditions” were the Evil, not the name of the Law. )

So I am trying to make a similar appeal. But I’m trying to take it one step further. If you finally can understand that taxes are your friend, not your enemy, and that if we raised a few taxes and thresholds, most of us would be much better off (like, why do we only pay into Social Security up to the first ~$100K? If we just doubled that limit, SS would be solvent forever!), then the next logical step is to vote our interests! If Coronavirus has taught us anything, it’s that, like it or not, we are all in this together! There is more that attacks us all than attacks us by political party, and we need to remove those things…and people…that are the problem areas.

Elected officials who ignore science/medical experts and try to score political points &/or make a profit off of the pandemic? Gotta go!

Cabinet members who won’t support the essential pandemic preventions, the climate change data, the pollution controls, the emergency management infrastructure…buh-bye!

Tax policies that favor the uber-rich and ignore the needs of the majority of us? See ya’!

I am hoping that the bare facts stare us square in the face and make us realize that we have the wrong 535 people in Washington. Maybe not ALL 535, but clearly the group, as a whole, is not working on our behalf in the manner that the Constitution, and ou best interests, would require them to. So let’s get rid of those who are the most obvious offenders. The ones who are too stubborn, too entrenched, too “bought-and-paid-for” or too extreme, to work together, in our best interests, have gotta go, no matter what side of the aisle, they, or you, typically reside on. Because the only way we survive both the virus itself, and the economic hardship that awaits us, is to pitch in together. To raise that “28%” up, maybe quite a bit at first, especially on those who can afford it the most, until we are all back on solid ground. That probably means: releasing your taxes, elected officials who haven’t done so, so we can see what your real motivations are. It probably means re-structuring a lot of mortgages/loans/rental agreements, (I/m talking to you, big lending corporations), so that these months when almost no one was working won’t put so many people/small businesses, out of business/into bankruptcy (so no, y’all can’t swoop in and make a killing from the crisis/on our backs).

So, yeah, taxes. The first salvo in what I hope is a successful battle for the future. (I know, “Drama much, Clayton?”) 🙂

What say ye?

Apr 30, 2020: “Why We Can’t Wait,” 2020 version

Yes, I know. It’s been a while since I have posted anything here. I’ve started to, a few times. But somehow, I either got distracted, discouraged, or overwhelmed by the circumstances that I would begin to write about: the attempt to bully people with the Citizenship Question; the benching of Eli; the Impeachment; the CoVid 19 virus; the childish and counter-productive public scuffles between our Mayor and our Governor–when they could be…should be…need to be, Batman and Robin, coming to our rescue…together; the unbelievably politically-transparent and unconscionable discussion about de-funding the US Postal Service…in an election year, where we are being asked…no, told, to stay at home, etc, etc.

Yes, I know. And “Why We Can’t Wait” is not a title I re-use lightly. By no means do I confuse my circumstances, my sense of urgency, nor my eloquence, with those of the 1964 original. I am not, nor have I ever been, in a Birmingham jail. I do not have the nerve to think that my words will carry as far, nor carry with them, anywhere near the weight, of the original. Part of why I use this hallowed title, is that many of you may be too young to recognize the title–a real shame, that–and if this is how/when you first learn of the 1964 MLK classic of the same name, well then I’ve already done some good, no? But I also did want to let you know, right from the giddy-up, that this post isn’t going to be light-hearted. No NY Giants rant, no music or movie review…not this time, anyway. I have had some things on my chest, and I’d like your help figuring out what to do with them. Here goes…

2020 is turning out to be a bigger year than any of us could have imagined, and we all knew it was going to be pretty big, to be clear. We are, at least figuratively, at war.

War against the CoVid 19 crisis, for certain. That’s a war where we should all be able to agree who the enemy is–who the good guys are, and who the bad guys are. But somehow even that has some “gray area” because of our lack of leadership–on many levels.

War against the impending gerrymandering that looms largely overhead as a great many of us wrestle with whether it is “safe” to fill out the US Census. Well, I know what’s unsafenot filling it out and leaving the re-districting and re-distribution of our tax dollars in the hands of those who have you fearful of filling it out in the first place!

War with the very notion of fairness and democracy. Are we even seriously having a conversation about not bailing out the US Postal Service? Especially in an election year in which we are being asked…told…to stay at home?!

But I would argue that the war I want to fight is one that I don’t really hear (m)any people talking about right now…the war over taxes. Oh, we talk about it aplenty, but not all that much at the moment. With good reason, obviously, because so much more is at stake. But getting enough people to wrap their heads around taxes just may be a way to bring about at least one happy ending in 2020…in November of 2020 in particular. And it’s for that reason that I have deigned to use this hallowed title.

Put simply, I’m tired of the bad name that taxes are saddled with.

I LOVE PAYING TAXES, AND SO SHOULD YOU!

There, I’ve said it. Now, to defend it. Let me start by asking you, do you belong to Costco? I don’t, but I hear good things about it, and I’m just curious if you are a member. Second question: do you prefer to shop at a large, well-stocked supermarket, or at the local corner store (the “bodega” as we call it in NYC.) What I’m getting at is the notion of buying in bulk, and its obvious advantages. That’s all that taxes are, plain and simple. The ability to buy in bulk, collectively, for as many things as possible. And that’s a good thing, not a bad thing.

Let me put it another way. If you are living an a household of more than two people, just about anywhere in the United States, and your household makes less than $60,000 per year, you pretty much will spend ALL of your money, every year, over a reasonable period of time, say, a decade. I would argue that, for most urban-dwellers–which is ~80% of us–that figure is more like $75,000 or more. Yes, you may save a few dollars here and there for emergencies, vacations, to buy a car or a house, etc, but in the long run, you will wind up spending almost all of that money, &/or be in debt: mortgage, car note, college loans, credit cards, personal loans–equal to or greater than your savings and equity. (Meaning that you are paying out more in interest than you are earning in interest, which is a problem for another time.) So, yes, you are spending all of your money, every year, just to stay afloat in your lifestyle. And a case can be made that that is true well beyond $75,000–maybe twice as high as that, actually.

What Conservatives have managed to do during my lifetime is to somehow make you think that you are better off at the bodega than at Costco or at the supermarket.

Why do we buy in bulk? Because it’s cheaper, and for the same products that we’d be buying anyway: which leaves us in better position to buy more of those things, and, to be able to buy other things that we might not have been able to buy if we hadn’t saved money by buying in bulk. This isn’t rocket science, people. A roll of paper towels at the corner bodega is $1.25. A dozen rolls of the same paper towels is $6.99 at the supermarket! Now, I don’t know if you have a big enough pantry to store the other 11 rolls, but the argument can’t be that buying the single roll is “cheaper,” or even “smarter,” right? But that’s always been the Conservative’s argument. That it is both cheaper and in your best interests for you to buy your own paper towels than it is to let the government buy them, and store them, and for you to just pick them up from that government storage unit when you need them. Well, it’s not, they’re wrong, they’re lying, and they know it. Sadly, a lot of us don’t seem to know it. And that’s why I chose this title. Because unless and until we get a lot more people–especially people who make under $100,000 per year, to see the obvious benefit of pooling our resources and coming to agreement on what to do with those resources in ways that best serves the majority of us, we will continue to be the victims of a divide-and-conquer, bait-and-switch group of elected officials. We will continue to be victims to: poor education, lowered pollution standards, outdated infrastructure, alarmingly high health-care costs, yadda-yadda-yadda.

Again, you are going to spend ALL of your money every year anyway. So, your choices are: spend some of it, say, 72% on your own, at the bodega, and the other 28% (taxes) “at Costco/the supermarket,” or, spend a little less at the bodega, and a little more at Costco. Which budget works in your best interests? What if you could spend 65% at the bodega and 35% at Costco? (And with a guaranteed storage space for the bulk items that don’t fit in your house, btw, because that’s another thing that government can do that you can’t.) Would you be better off or worse off? Would you be able to buy more “luxury items” of your own choosing with the “I-keep-72%” model, or with the “I-keep-65%”. Ironically, it’s with the 65% model. Because you would have gotten so much more done with the 35% at Costco, that you actually would have more “disposable income” even with what seems like 7% less of your money to “control.” Because you would now have wa-a-ay more than 7% more of everything already bought and paid for by your taxes (the 35%).

Too abstract? Okay, here’s an easier example. You can’t pay for the paving of roads, the building of schools, or the repairing of bridges by yourself–that’s obvious. But what’s less obvious is that, when taxes are lower, those schools you do have, may have to cut the music/arts program. So, now you have to hire a local musician to give your kid private clarinet lessons–and you have to rent the clarinet from the music store in the next town over–and you have to be sure that your kid really likes the clarinet in the first place before any of that happens. So, in many cases, it doesn’t happen, and we, as a society, just lost another mediocre-but-fully-enriched high school clarinet player. But if you’d been paying 35% instead of 28%, you’d have a fully-functioning music department in your kid’s elementary and middle schools, with several different instruments for him/her to choose from each year, and music classes every week, and performances every year. So she may have started out on trumpet in 5th grade before switching to clarinet in 7th, and by the time she graduated from high school, was 2nd chair in the jazz ensemble, was a member of the marching band, and had a plethora of stories to write about in her college application essay about the incredible experiences she has had playing this instrument that she loves–even though she’s going to major in Mechanical Engineering. All because you paid 7% more of your money in taxes–money that you were going to spend anyway, and would have had more “freedom” to spend as you saw fit if the taxes were lower…just without a clarinet-ist in the family.

So, that’s why we can’t wait. We have to do a few things right the hell now! We have to register to vote, and make sure everyone that we know, registers, too. We have to fill out the Census, and make sure everyone we know fills it out, too. And we have to start preparing Plans A, B and C for how to make sure our votes are counted in November. If that means getting a picture ID, for you and everyone you know…get it done! If that means creating car pools, or chartering buses, or buying folding chairs so people can get to the polls, and then wait on interminable lines, get it done! If it means setting up live entertainment, or providing laptops for family Zoom meetings over free wi-fi, or showing large-screen movies or concerts at the polling places, so people will feel more comfortable waiting on those incredibly, intentionally long lines, make it happen!

Because We Can’t Wait anymore. 2020 is the time we have been waiting for. The time to get things done, to shape the future, to BE the future. Are you up for the challenge?

Sept 4, 2019 – a timely poem…

T’was the night before football, and all through the land

Every creature was stirring, every coach, every fan

The shockings all stung: Luck retired? Odell’s where?

With the hope’s that a playoff berth soon would be theirs

The children were nestled all snug in their beds

While visions of dynasties danced in their heads

And mama with her KC Chief, and I with my Pats

Had just settled with our bookies, our Week 1 stats

When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter

I sprang from my mancave to see what was the matter

Away to the website I flew like a flash

Tore open a brewski; ponied up the cash

When what to my wondering eyes should appear

But a miniature sleigh with 8 tiny reindeer

With a little old driver (this must be some party,

I bet at the end there’ll be a Lombardi)

More rapid than Eagles (of course, we exclaimed)

He whistled and shouted and called them by name:

Now Saquon! Now Eli! Now coaching assistants!

Now Zeitler! Now rookies! Now Bettcher, keep blitzin’!

To the top o‘ the division, with home-field n’ all

Now get away, get away, bad breaks and calls,

Vs Brady, Part 3, said all of the stories

With Rosas in OT, we returned to our glories!

Apologies rained, with “experts” recantin’

Now singing a chorus of, “Eli for Canton!”

We hoisted the trophy, much to my delight

Yadda, yadda, yadda, and to all…a good night! 🙂

Aug 20, 2019 – Top 10 reasons for “minus 45”

So, I have been posting less and less often, as you can see, as the year progesses. For a few reasons, really, but perhaps most of all, because I am seriously both drained, and terrified, by this Administration. But last week’s events were hard to ignore. Yes, the President of the United States “asked” another country (Israel…who complied with his unprecedented/inane request, btw) to refuse to receive two sitting members of Congress!! Seriously?! Yes…seriously.

So, another new low. I mean, you just don’t DO that, right? You don’t put politics/party over country, right? You don’t undermine our own Democratic Principles, on the international stage, just to score a few political points with your base…right?

I tried “We Deserve Better” a while ago (as a slogan/sign of our displeasure). Now maybe I’ll try something a little more “pop-culture-ish.” Here are my…

Top 10 Reasons to Impeach 45…immediately:

10) His Cabinet–this is a clear example of incompetence…his and theirs, and can/should not be tolerated. The obvious mal-feasance of appointing and retaining people like: DeVos, Perry and Carson, not to mention former ones who have left, like: Flynn, Pruitt , Acosta, and Whitaker, should have been reason enough to dust off and fire up the Impeachment Engine. Here is a July 12th Fox News listing of some of the “departures:” https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-trump-administration-officials-a-list-of-notable-departures

9) The “Ostrich Approach” to Climate Change, perhaps best evidenced by the recent decision to move all of the climate scientists from D.C. to Kansas City–just so that most of them would be forced to quit. I guess that’s one way to quell dissent. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/456153-top-climate-change-scientist-quits-usda-saying-trump-administration

8) The shutting down of the government–why exactly? Oh yeah, the wall…that Mexico is gonna pay for.

7) The lies…all 12,000 of ’em! There simply has to be some accountability for the constant stream of lies!

6) The failure to release his taxes. I actually could see this one as reason enough all by itself, but it clearly was a red flag that we all should have latched onto. (Perhaps we can tie this one in with his clear refusal to acknowledge the Emoluments [aka the “Title of Nobility”] Clause?)

5) Dissing our allies and cozying up to Vlad & Kim. Do I really have to even explain this one? (Well, just in case, how about the notion that our President repeatedly and openly takes/trusts the words of foreign dictators–some of whom are historically/traditionally our staunch adversaries–over the words/advice of our own intelligence agencies, and those of our allies?)

4) His tacit (if not overt) support of/by the “Alt-Right.” From Charlottesville, to his description/depiction of Mexicans, Muslims, and “S-hole countries,” is there really any doubt as to his, shall we say, “racial priorities?” And are those the qualities we want to tolerate from our President?

3) Asking a foreign country (Israel) not to receive two sitting members of Congress–my personal last straw of last straws. We simply can NOT allow a President to disrespect his co-equal branch of government like this! Can you imagine if Obama had done that? Republicans would have lost their God-damned MINDS! And rightfully so, btw. But of course, they didn’t have to lose their minds (that was an unforced choice on their part) because Obama would never in a million years have done something that ridiculous…neither would any of the other 43 Presidents prior to Obama, btw.

2) His Family Separation Debacle…nuff sed.

1) The overt/flagrant/repeated Obstructions of Justice–too many to list, but telling potential witnesses that they should refuse to comply with a Congressional subpeona is enough for me to check this box with. And more than enough to remove a sitting President for.

June 12, 2019 – It’s time…

I have tried to be patient, and to listen to both sides of the (Dems) argument regarding impeachment. Yes, there is a risk that a segment of the population may not be quite up to speed on why it is clear that 45 must be removed from office–and, that 45 might use the impeachment–which is likely to not remove him from office, since the Republicans control the Senate–as a means of gaining political support in his 2020 re-election bid. Yes, that is a risk. He could, conceivably, use the “failed impeachment” to his political advantage. But, From Where I Sit, it’s clearly time.

(Just a few of) the facts are that: 45 has interfered with so many aspects of the Mueller investigation–in plain sight–that there is no reasonable defense against Obstruction of Justice. He has criticized American politicians/elected officials &/or candidates, while on foreign soil…repeatedly. He has told the CIA not to infiltrate N. Korea, because “he trusts” Kim Jong-un. He has sided with Putin over our Justice Department, repeatedly. He has shaken much of the Right’s faith in the Fourth Estate, the American Press. He has separated children from their parents at our Southern border (yes, only the Southern border…hmmm), even, at times, placing them in cages, and having no real plan for reassembling these families. He proudly shut down the Government because we didn’t fund his wall (you know, the one Mexico was supposed to pay for). He has a Cabinet that is largely in an adversarial relationship with (to the extent that they have a clue at all about) the very Departments that they oversee. He has allowed the “Alt-Right” to flourish, out in the open. He has chosen three Attorney Generals for their loyalty to him, not to us, or to the Constitution. He has told several people to flagrantly ignore Congressional subpoenas. He has blatantly/repeatedly ignored the Emoluments Clause–enriching himself by–among other things–owning the hotels that foreign dignitaries stay in when visiting the White House &/or the President’s “vacation home,” Mar-a-Lago. And now, he has admitted to being more than happy to accept “dirt on an opponent” from anyone, even a foreign adversary–calling the FBI Director “wrong” about that being inappropriate.

These are just a few of the countless examples that we have a President who needs to be removed…immediately.

If we don’t impeach, we send two messages: 1) that maybe he hasn’t done anything wrong (which, shockingly, some people still seem willing to believe), and 2) that possible political gain/loss is a greater concern than simply doing what the Constitution says we must do when its laws are broken. That’s not the “high road,” it’s the scared road. And I don’t even think it’s a winning road. It’s time to get off of that road. It’s time to impeach. We don’t need more evidence. We don’t need more time to “make the case.” We don’t need to concern ourselves with whether he might win re-election. We need to defend the Constitution…period!

My new slogan–which I came up with for these trying times as a message that I think captures the spirit of the times we live in–is simple:

“We Deserve Better”

I don’t just mean Democrats. I mean Americans in general. This man thinks that he is above the law. That he, in effect, is the law. And that the law and the governement are here to support, protect, defend and enrich him, specifically. Personally, I hope that a lot of us disagree. That we think that…

We Deserve Better…

I’m working on a logo for it that interlocks the “E’s,” in a crossword puzzle-esque visual, loosely in the shape of the number 4. But that’s not my strength. I’m much more of a wordsmith than a graphics artist! But if any of you want to take a crack at creating a visual that can fit nicely on a bumper sticker, a T-shirt, or maybe even a baseball cap…go for it! (But please share it with me before you go live with it. I want to retain some semblance of control over the message/slogan/logo.) But we need to get it out there ASAP, as a sign to elected officials that we know that it’s time to act! That we have their back if/when they move forward. And I hope that the slogan catches on in a bi-partisan way…you know, country over party. I hope that this slogan will inspire people to contact their elected officials directly–maybe by sending selfies of themselves wearing/sporting it. This, in addition to the subtle-yet-visible/physical support that simply wearing it, posting it up, saying, sharing it with others, tweeting it, etc, will provide all of us. These 3 words, this simple phrase, is my attempt to say to Congress, to each other, and to the world that, it’s time to act!

We Deserve Better

Don’t we?!

May 29, 2019 – the end of an era…

In case you haven’t heard, George Clinton and the Parlia-Funkadelic-ment Thang are on their last-ever tour this year. I have been a loyal Funkateer since the mid-70s, so this is bittersweet. Much as I’m going to miss them, at least we get to say goodbye on stage, instead of just having them die off…literally…before we can say goodbye (as many of them have already done, sadly–e.g. Eddie, Glenn, Bernie, Garry, etc, etc). Okay, so, some of y’all have asked me why I love P-Funk so much, and why it’s important that they be seen live, this one last time. If you haven’t seen them before, it may be hard to explain to you how much cooler your life could’ve been! 😊  

Seriously, if, for example, you had been at MSG on Thursday, June 8th, 1978, for “The Landing of the Holy Mothership,” you would unna-stand. But there’s no way to  re-create those days. The videos are slammin’, but not the same (check out the Capitol Theater in Passaic, NJ, or the Houston Astrodome concert footage from that tour. It’ll be about as close as you’re gonna get to re-living the P-Funk Earth tour.)

Let’s just say that other than maybe James Brown, Sly, Prince, EW&F, and Larry Graham, this is a level of Funk that has never been reached before…or since!

So, here are some of the songs, that made them great. To be clear, P-Funk in person is so-o-o much better than even these unbelievably funky songs. The live show was, as George called it, “A Funk Opera.” But the songs were obviously a major part of said opera.

Here are 25 that I’d recommend for those of you who are new to the Funk…and as a small sample of the good ole days for those of you who aren’t new to it. That latter group, please weigh in. I’d love to hear what your “Top 25 “is! What’d I miss that you need to add?!

My favorite 25 P-Funk songs (‘cause 10 just ain’t-a-damn-nuff’!) with apologies in advance to the ones I left off that’ll make me say, “Damn, you’re right…that should’a been on the list!”

25. Free Yo’ Mind and Your Ass Will Follow

24. No Compute

23. Night of the Thumpasaurus Peoples

22. Better by the Pound

21. Red Hot Mama

20. No Head, No Backstage Pass

19. Funkin’ For Fun

18. Not Just Knee Deep

17. Sir Nose’d D’Voidoffunk

16. Get Off Yo’ Ass and Jam

15. Super Stoopid

14. Starchild (Mothership Connection)

13. Take Yo’ Dead Ass Home!

12. Up for the Down Stroke

11. Funkentelechy

10. Chocolate City

9. Aqua Boogie (Psychoalphadiscobetabioaquadoloop)

8. Maggot Brain

7. Standin’ on the Verge (of Getting’ it On)

6. Cosmic Slop

5. P-Funk (Wants to Get Funked Up)

4. Atomic Dog

3. Flash Light

2. One Nation Under a Groove

1. Tear the Roof Off/Give Up the Funk

Arrrgghh, I can already think of another 10 or 15 that would be on almost anybody else’s top 20! To be clear, I’m purposely leaving off the various other off-shoots/spin-offs, etc. So, no Bootsy’s Rubber Band, no Roger Troutman & Zapp, no FredWesley & the Horny Horns, no Parlet, no Brides of Funkensein, etc, etc. I had a hard enough time limiting myself to 25 as it is! The one “Extra Credit” song I’ll add here is “We Can Funk” which was a P-Funk/Prince collaboration of a previously un-released Prince track, and shows up on the Prince movie soundtrack album “Grafitti Bridge.” Prince and George on the same record?! That’s gotta get in here somehow!

Well, I suggest you listen to about 5 at a time, to avoid a Funk-overload! Oh, and please, lemme know whatcha think, and what you’d add…it’s ’bout to get funky up in here!

Apr 26, 2019: The NFL draft – Part 1

The Day After Christmas-in-April in review: So, I had to leave the house right after the 11th pick of Round 1 last night to go see Avengers Endgame (my new “BME,” btw…Best. Movie. Ever! We’ll talk about that more next week after more of you have had a chance to see it.) So, despite my utter rage at pick #6, I didn’t know anything about the rest of Round 1 until about 1:30AM, when I got home. And I stayed up until about 2:00 trying to piece together what I had, personally, done to Giants GM, Dave Gettleman, to make him so pissed at me! Because I took these picks PERSONALLY! Surely he MUST know that, right after my fam, comes the Giants in my heart. That my favorite days of my life–the ones that will flash before my eyes as I’m dying, are: 1) the birth of my son, 2) my wedding day; 3) Obama’s first Pres. Election win; 4-7) the Giants 4 Super Bowl wins; 8) Obama’s 2nd Pres. Election win; 9-12) the release of the 4 Avengers Movies… But I digress.
 
So, with a few hours worth of sleep and an hour on the MTA with which to contemplate, I’ve decided that I actually hate the reasoning behind the picks even more than the players picked, if that makes sense. If you had told me before the draft that we would wind up with Dexter Lawrence and DeAndre Baker, I would’ve been fine with that–happy, even. I like those guys! I think they make our team better than we were yesterday. We lost: Vernon, Mauro, Edwards and Wynn in the last 6 weeks…all of whom play D-line. So clearly we needed a D-line infusion from this draft, and Lawrence is a HUGE presence in the middle of the line that can probably help us shut down the run, in rotation with Tomlinson. And DeAndre Baker probably will be a solid CB–the man hasn’t given up a TD pass in 2 years! And maybe that lets us trade Janoris Jenkins (+ a pick or 2, probably) in order to add another pick in the 2nd Round–where now we only have The Great Void of 63 picks until we’re on the clock again! And perhaps Daniel Jones will turn out to BE Eli Manning, Jr, and win us a Super Bowl one day…perhaps. But that doesn’t justify the way in which we got them.
First let me also add that, had they been picked in the exact reverse order, we all probably would be a lot less pissed off. If Baker was chosen at #6, though I would’ve still been mad as hell that we didn’t take Josh Allen or Ed Oliver, at least I would’ve understood that since we rea-a-ally need CBs, that makes some sense, and maybe we can now trade Janoris for a 2nd-rounder, yadda, yadda. That would have been annoying, but a bit more understandable. Frankly, I don’t think this is a great CB crop, so if you think there’s only one great one (Baker), then you gotta grab him early. And I’m fine with Dexter at #17–though I think we could’ve traded down to ~20-23 and gotten another pick…and probably still gotten Dexter. And if we had traded up to get Jones…AFTER Haskins was gone, but still in the 1st round (at #30, just like we did trade up to) so that we could have that 5th year option on a QB who likely won’t play much if at all his first year, well, that would’ve actually seemed like a “savvy” move. So, we’d have had the same 3 players, but all of these people wouldn’t be storming Giants-ville HQ in a mob asking for Gettleman’s head on a platter (look outside your window–it’s a thing). Hence, the process is worse than the results.
That said, Josh Allen and Ed Oliver are much more likely to be the next LT and Aaron Donald than Daniel Jones is to be the next Tom Brady!
Which means, we blew it. 
Not that I expect any of those 3 players to become any of those 3 legends, but you get the point. The floor is lower…so is the ceiling…for Daniel Jones than for Allen & Oliver. And I am certain that we could’ve had Jones at #9 (when Oliver was taken), if not later. Which means that, at the least, we should’ve traded down to #9 and asked for Buffalo’s 2nd round pick (#40 overall). So even if we didn’t take Allen or Oliver, at least we could’ve gotten a few more 2nd-round picks back to load up with at other positions.
Here’s how that phone call would’ve played out, made right after the Bucs took Devin White @ #5:
Getty/us: Hey Bills, we’re thinking of taking Josh Allen or Ed Oliver, but I was wondering if you’d want one of them?
Them (salivating): Um, well, yeah, sure, we’ll take one of them off your hands if they’re a burden.
Us: Okay, but we’ll need your #9 & #40.
Them (drooling): Well, um, okay, I guess that’s fair (read: Is that ALL?!)
And there you have it. We have an extra 2nd-round pick and STILL get to draft Jones if we want to at #9. Neither Jax, Detroit or Buffalo–the 3 teams picking right after us–needed a QB, so it’s not like we were gonna miss out on taking Jones by waiting until #9. And Buffalo would’ve been very concerned that Allen &/or Oliver could go before #9–they should have–so they’d have been all in.
Another point: imagine for a moment that we took Allen OR Oliver, & then Lawrence at #17 (and kept our #37 pick). Our defense would be looking much better now. And we’d still have a chance to add either a CB or a RT at #37, and still have had all of our picks left. Would that have been so terrible?
Instead, I have to watch Allen wreak havoc for Jax, and Oliver for Buffalo (who we play in Week 2 this year, btw), and probably watch Haskins (who is on Washington now) outplay Jones for a decade or more.
But that Avengers Endgame, man, that was SOME MOVIE!
As in, breathe, Clayton, breathe…it’s only a football draft…

March 18, 2019 – Another NY Giants rant.

So, on Saturday we gave Eli his $5M, which essentially locks us into another year with him at starting QB…or does it?

The fact is, there is another perfectly viable explanation. If we are going to want to make any trades before the upcoming NFL draft next month, it was imperative that we keep Eli. We obviously have no one else on the roster that we are ready to go into 2019 with at the helm. So, if we had cut/released Eli, everyone else in the league would know that we were desperate, which would give us no leverage at all in making a trade with, say, Arizona for Josh Rosen, or the Jets for the #3 pick. That would mean that we would likely have had to give Arizona one of our 1st round picks instead of the 2nd or maybe even 3rd rounder that the rest of the league seems to have valued Rosen at. That’s not in the best interests of our team. But by keeping Eli (and, not asking him to restructure his deal), we send the message that we are fine with having him back again, so, no, Arizona, et al, we don’t need your draft pick all that badly. So, aside from the fact that I actually think Eli’ll be just fine now that we have a real RG (& especially if we get a real RT, too), this was the move to make even if you want to draft or trade for a QB this year.

By comparison, look at what the Jets did last year to trade up 3 spots to draft Sam Darnold (who, btw, I am far from convinced about): they gave up three 2nd round picks and their own #6 overall pick in order to move up three spots to draft him. Two of those picks turned out to be Quenton Nelson, who will arguably be the best LG in all of football for the next 10 years (and is as good a bet as anyone from last year’s draft to be a HOFer); and Braden Smith, another outstanding O-lineman at RT (he moved there from RG to fill a team need, and excelled at it). They also got a pass-rushing DE, Kemoko Turay (5 sacks), and backup RB (Jordan Wilkins). As a result, the Colts gave up the fewest sacks in the NFL last year and made the playoffs, while Gang Green was 3 & 13 and has the #3 pick again this year. Oh, and the Colts get to use that final 2nd-round pick in the 2nd round of this year’s draft. Had the Jets simply drafted those same players themselves, and kept Teddy B at QB, what are the chances that they would be worse off now? Next to zero, since they only won 3 games as it is. Teddy and that improved O-line would’ve easily been good for 4 wins, and likely a few more, no? Oh, and btw, Darnold has already missed more games due to injury (3) than Eli has missed in his entire career (0), so, the whole, “we need a mobile QB” trope…um, not so much. Stay your ass in the pocket, fall when the sack is unavoidable, and live to see another play. Because the most important ability for a QB is AVAIL-ability, and Eli has been the role model for that for 15 years! (Speaking of which, Odell missed 21 of the 80 games in his 5 years with us. That’s more than 25% of his games. And Olivier missed 9 of his 48 games as a Giant—all of which were in the last two years/32 games. Just sayin’…)

From where I sit, there are four possible explanations as to what the Gettleman/the Giants are planning:

1) We have no plan, and are just incompetent. I know that a lot of Giants fans seem to believe that this is the case. I’m not one of them. Last year’s draft was arguably one of the best in Giants history: Saquon and Hernandez are excellent, Carter has the physical tools to be a beast, Hill is already a solid starter on the D-line, and we haven’t really seen what we can get from McIntosh or Beal yet (not to mention Lauletta). We also added Grant Haley, Tae Davis and Sean Chandler as rookies last year. When’s the last time that many rookies made the team, much less contributed? Two years from now we may be looking back on that draft as the turning point in our success. Thanks, Dave!

2) We trade for Josh Rosen. Ideally, with the 3rd round pick we just got from Cleveland (now, wouldn’t that make the Beckham/Vernon trade feel a little different?) But even if we get him with our 2nd round pick, that’s not bad…if Rosen turns out okay. And would it shock you if, 3 years from now, Rosen is better than Darnold, and has taken us to the playoffs once or twice? It wouldn’t shock me at all.

3) We draft Haskins with the #6 pick, and use the #17 on a RT (e.g. Dillard, Risner, Cajuste, or Taylor), and the 2nd round pick on Defense (a CB or an ILB?). Yes, our defense may still be mediocre, but the O-line will be outstanding, and we’ll have our next QB, ready to sit and learn from the master for at least a half-year or so. We can fix the defense *next year, or at least later in the draft this year. (We do have 12 picks this year, after all.)

4) Here’s the wildcard—we play Eli this year, don’t draft a QB, and sign then-free agent Russell Wilson next year! He’s an unrestricted free agent next season. What if he’s already made known that he wants to play here? (There have been rumors about that online already.) If you knew that you had a better-than-decent shot at Wilson next year, and that what he needed from you in order to agree to come here is: an improved O-line, less drama in the clubhouse (from, say, big-ego’d WRs and OLBs) and a decent defense, wouldn’t you try to make that happen? And would you, maybe, sign his all-time favorite target (Tate) as a WR now, to show him that you are working to make him happy? Just askin’…

So, there you have it—four plausible explanations for why we still have Eli. Oh, and btw, the “next year asterisk” above was to remind me to mention that we will likely have the most cap space in the NFL next year…roughly $100M! So yeah, we can afford Wilson next year, and a few other pieces as well. So, fixing the defense next year, via free agency, shouldn’t be too much to ask.

(A link to the Over-the-cap.com page, where you can click on the NY Giants, and then on the year 2020.)

And again, we have 12 picks this year (in, essentially, an 8-round draft)—four of which are within the first three rounds. Maybe we can trade up with a few mid-to-late round picks (we have two 4th-rounders & three 5th-rounders) for another pick or 2 within the first 3 rounds? With 5 or 6 picks in the first 3 rounds, we should be able to shore up at least one or two more spots on both sides of the ball, no? I can see us drafting:

Round 1–Montez Sweat/OLB w/#6, Devin White-or-Bush/ILB w/#17; Round 2—Yodny Cajuste or Hjalte Froholdt/RT; then a trade up for Amari Oruwariye or Justin Layne/CB; Round 3—Andy Isabella, Emanuel Hall, or Hakeem Butler/WR; then another trade up for Charles Omenihu, Ben Banogu, or Anthony Nelson/DE. That still leaves us with several picks in the later rounds, where people like Drue Tranquill or Germaine Pratt/LB, and Jamel Dean, David Long, or Ken Webster/CB may still be available. And remember, we already improved this off-season at RG, slot WR, and FS at the very least. That’s not a bad start to a re-build!

Do/will I miss Odell?…Heck yeah! He was the most exciting WR in the league these past 5 years. Do I wish we had signed Daryl Williams &/or Teddy B this year (or Andrew Norwell last year)? Definitely. (And I still don’t understand why we didn’t. They each signed for less than we could’ve paid them, and, they all had seemed like shoo-ins.) But I’m not ready to throw in the towel on Dave Gettleman, just yet (much less on the Giants overall). Because I don’t think he deserves that…yet. So I’ll continue to root for him to sign another free agent (RT Mike Remmers?) and to have another great draft and put us back on the right path.

Plus, I root for the name on the helmet more so than the names on the jerseys.

March 7, 2019 – YIKES!

So, today is my birthday, which, at my age, is more of an acknowledgement than a celebration. 🙂 But it does bring to mind how much has changed in my lifetime, so here are a few things that were different when I was born:

When I was born:

There were only 49 states, so, yes, I’m older than the flag.

Network TV was broadcast only in Black & White, and there had never been a televised Presidential debate. Radio was broadcast in “Mono” (as in, not in stereo).

Vince Lombardi hadn’t won an NFL championship yet, and the Boston Celtics had only won one. The greatest forward to ever play the game, Elgin Baylor, was just about to win the NBA Rookie of the Year award, but Wilt Chamberlain and Oscar Robertson were still in college. NYC only had one pro team in baseball, basketball, football and hockey. The single-season HR record was 60, set by Babe Ruth (in a season where HE hit more HRs than 12 of the other 15 TEAMS in major league baseball!) BTW, when I was born, there were only 8 teams in the NBA, 12 in the NFL, and 16 in baseball. Oh, and no Black man had ever won the college football Heisman Trophy when I was born. And the Olympic record for the 100 meters was Jesse Owens’ 10.3 seconds.

There was this new idea that hadn’t happened yet, but would in a few months, called…The Grammy’s. Another cool new idea had been born just six months before I was, called…NASA.

A young, 17-year-old amateur boxer from Kentucky (who no one had ever heard of…yet) named Cassius Clay was hoping to one day replace then-heavyweight champion…Floyd Patterson.

Inter-racial marriage was still illegal in all of America. But Whites Only and Colored Only public facilities were more than common (and perfectly legal). So was “Redlining” (Google it.) At birth, Robert Wagner was my Mayor, Nelson Rockefeller was my Governor, Jacob Javits and Kenneth Keating (both Republicans, btw) were my Senators.

And as of today, I am officially closer to 100 years old than to my teenage years!

So, as you can see, I’ve been through, and witnessed, a LOT. I’m tired! 🙂

But thanks, everyone, for the well-wishes!

Mar 5, 2019 – Is RACISM > democracy?

So, it is very apparent that ~35 – 40% of the country is simply not wiling to even attempt to reign in 45. There have been SO many scandals that would, each individually, have brought down any (each/all) of the other 44 Administrations, that have done nothing to move the needle on the approval rating of 45, that the only logical conclusion is that: they’re all in with 45, no matter what.

He can: ignore Congress’s power of the purse; demonize the press; abandon our international allies/cozy up with Russia & N. Korea; refuse to EVER release his taxes; essentially/implicitly admit to paying off porn star affairs (oh yeah, a month before his election, btw); be the face of the “Alt-Right,”; find “Good and Bad people on both sides” of Charlottesville; separate infants from their parents–with no reasonable plan for ever reuniting them–for daring to seek asylum in America; and have more people from his campaign/Administration found/plead Guilty of crimes than all of the other non-Nixonian Administrations…combined! (etc, etc) And still, according to the polls at least, he’s consistently been at a pretty firm minimum of 35% approval.

So, what have we learned, grasshopper?

It seems that the only logical explanation (for this illogical set of circumstances) is that ~1/3 of the country fears the inevitability of our demographic future more than they fear a monarchy. In other words, they’d rather have a King of White America, than a Democracy that’s occasionally led by Black and Brown people. Think about that:

(Love of) RACISM > (love of) democracy!

I seriously don’t see any other explanation. So, what to do about it? Here are the two options that I can see as available to us:

  1. We re-investigate the Civil War, a la an NFL scoring review: “Upon further review, the ruling on the field is over-turned…the South can, indeed, secede!
  2. We can try to remind those “45-supporters” of the stark evidence that they are wrong-headed in their worship of this Cult of Personality.

And here, simply, starkly, and I think, undeniably, is how we implement Option #2 (which I assume many of you will prefer…I’m not one of those who do, btw. Two countries is FINE with me):

George Wallace vs Nick Saban

The former stood on the steps of the University of Alabama and declared that Blacks were not, are not, and will not ever be welcomed at the U of A. (This, immediatley preceding/leading to the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing, and following the infamous words and deeds of “Bull Connor” in Birmingham.) Only under imminent threat of invasion by the US National Guard, did Wallace finally back down…only to later run for President, with the hope of returning things to the good ole days of segregation.

The latter, Nick Saban, on the other hand, has not only welcomed Blacks at the U of A, he has gotten the “Good Ole Boys” to cheer on “their Blacks” on the way to one national championships after another.

My point? That we might be able to point to this clear example of diametrically opposed mindsets and see which one worked out better–for the South! (Though, IMO, any elite Black athlete who enrolls in the U of A should have his behind beat…and so should his mama! But I digress…) Maybe this irrational fear of Blacks/Browns can be overcome, after all. Unless you seriously, truly, deeply still believe that Blacks and Whites are different/separate species, (in which case, I’m done witcha, btw) it must be clear from the Saban Approach, that Blacks can not only produce at a high level on a level playing field, but that it will become the “new normal” sooner than you might think. If Blacks and Whites can share a huddle, (and presumably, a classroom), why can’t we share a US Capitol, or a White House Administration, etc, etc? “We” (as in, those who support 45) can, we/y’all just have to overcome the entrenched fears/racism that blinds you to the obvious.

In other words, are you a Saban-Alabaman, or a Wallace-Trump Alabaman?

Frankly, my money is not on that happening any time soon, unfortunately…but one can hope for the best, I suppose. Why am I doubtful. Well, for one, Doug Jones just barely squeaked by Roy Moore, with all of Moore’s “baggage” for Senate. And in slightly older news, do you know which state was the last in America to “legalize” inter-racial marriage? Alabama…in the year 2000! And, by 59-41 “majority!” Yes, 19 years ago, Alabamans were asked to vote to affirm the Federal laws that allow inter-racial marriage. And over 40% of you said, “Um, not so much…” Seriously, I shit you not. So, no, I don’t have high hopes for the Death of Racism in the South. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/02/09/alabama-was-a-final-holdout-on-desegregation-and-interracial-marriage-it-could-happen-again-on-gay-marriage/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c05fa8017b69

From where I sit, what is clear (and should be to anyone who honestly evaluates the situation), is that US Democracy is on the brink of non-violent collapse (I think the technical term is a “coup”) at the hands, essentially, of racists. And it’s up to us to reign things in…or, to separate into two nations (again, I’m FINE with that latter option). But if we are to save the Democracy, there’s no more time for partisan politics–just the simple protection, and implementation, of the Constitution.

For those of you who believe in “signs,” the recent tornadoes in Alabama just might be a good example. There aren’t Black tornadoes or White tornadoes. Likewise, there aren’t (or shouldn’t be, anyway) any sense of Black or White tornade victims. We’re all in this together! (No, I won’t turn this into a climate change soap box speech…tempting as that is!) So, instead of focusing on the things that are different about us, why not focus on the commonalities?! A King is really not in our best interests. And if we agree on that, then we have to take the steps of protecting the Democracy. Many of you know a lot more than I do about exactly HOW we can/need to protect the Constitution/Democracy. I’m just here today to point out the need to…a la Saban, not Wallace.